Select Page

ARTAS Hair Transplants vs. Dr. Jones

Restoration Robotics, a company founded by Dr. Frederick H. Moll, developed the ARTAS System. This completely automated machine is the first robot designed to carry out the scoring aspect of the FUE hair transplant procedure.

Schedule Consultation

ARTAS Hair Transplants VS. Dr. Jones HOW ARTAS WORKS

ARTAS Hair Transplant Robot vs. Dr. Jones’ FUE Technique

Restoration Robotics, a company founded by Dr. Frederick H. Moll, developed the ARTAS System. This completely automated machine is the first robot designed to carry out the scoring aspect of the FUE hair transplant procedure.


Cameras, colour identification sensors, and 3-D imaging software guide the robotic arm of ARTAS in selecting which follicles to score. To carry out the rest of the FUE process, ARTAS employs a needle punch mechanism, disposable dermal punches, disposable cartridges, a video imaging system and a user interface.

The patient is positioned for the robot to punch out the grafts on a donor area of roughly 5 to 10 cm at a time. During this time, the patient must remain absolutely still, and the head is restrained by straps. After this, the surgeon removes each graft by hand with a pair of forceps. The patient is then repositioned for ARTAS to work on a new section of donor hair. This process continues until the extraction portion of surgery is complete. The implantation of grafts to the bald area is done using a traditional transplant approach.


The thought of a machine extracting FUE grafts is an attractive one if the machine can replicate the touch of an expert human practitioner, and if it can boost the speed of the extraction process.

In Dr. Jones’ opinion, this robot may work for doctors who wish to provide FUE, but don’t have the experience to do it manually or with a power punch.


  • Higher Transection Rate. The Artas Robot has a transection rate (destroyed grafts) of 8 to 10 percent. Dr. Jones’ transection rate is 3 to 5 percent. Artas charges the doctor for all the destroyed grafts as well as the viable grafts, so many doctors plant these destroyed grafts knowing they won’t grow. Dr. Jones only charges for and plants viable grafts.
  • Slower Rate of Extraction. The robot currently extracts about 600 grafts per hour, whereas Dr. Jones can extract 1,500 to 2,000 grafts per hour, enabling him to do 3,000 and even 4,000-graft sessions in a single day.
  • Larger Punch. The Artas system uses a punch with a diameter of 1.65 mm, and Dr. Jones uses punches from .7 to .9 mm. A smaller punch means faster healing of the donor area, and there is less likely to be damage to surrounding grafts.
  • More Likelihood of Buried Grafts. The Artas robot uses a dull punch system, which has been shown to be more likely to bury some of the grafts and cause cyst formation.
  • A Robot Cannot Select Grafts for an Individual Patient. Any automated device will still have limitations in discerning the best follicle for extraction. For example, it is important to select donor hairs with a specific hairline or eyebrow design in mind. It is difficult for a machine to do this, whereas Dr. Jones can pick and choose different size grafts depending on the patient’s needs.
  • Limited Donor Site. The Artas System is limited to areas that the square device can fit on (i.e. a strip around the back of the head). Dr. Jones is able to extract from all permanent areas, including the sideburns, the beard or any other area of the body he chooses.
  • The Need to Shave the Head. With the Artas System, the physician has to shave the patient’s head, where Dr. Jones can perform FUE without shaving.
  • Limited Hair Characteristics. ARTAS is only approved for use on patients with straight hair that is dark brown or black in colour. Dr. Jones can perform FUE on any hair colour or texture.

At this point, Dr. Jones feels the only advantage of the Artas Robot for an experienced FUE surgeon is a marketing one. It is slower, has a higher transection rate, is more expensive and has fewer choice of areas from which the grafts can be extracted.



At 62, with no immediate plans of retirement, I erred on the side of a full hairline where one once lived decades ago. Clearly, the feedback from my extensive FUE research, held Dr. Jones and team in high regard. Today, exactly 12 months later, I would be remiss if I did not add to the long history of success stories. He and his team explained every step from initial consult to month by month expectations. His technical skills are surpassed only by his knowledge and ever-available support along the way. The backdrop in my pics are no longer seen through the middle of my scalp. Instead, I present a definitive hairline as well as natural fill to the back of my head.

My advice: do it before your dome becomes too pronounced.

Would I do it again? In a heartbeat!

Thank you Dr. Robert Jones and team – I’m proud to be your senior poster child!


Hair Transplant info center

Proven Results

There are thousands of hair transplant providers in the market. How do you judge the quality of a hair transplant...Read More


Dr. Jones devised his own FUE technique known as follicular unit micrografting...Read More


Dr. Jones devised his own FUE technique known as follicular unit micrografting and provides...Read More

No-Shave FUE

Traditionally, the FUE hair transplant procedure required the doctor to shave the donor zone. Patients undergoing...Read More

PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma)

A popular and proven treatment, PRP appears to help regrow lost hair. And, there are virtually...Read More




Strip surgery can often achieve a extremely large number of grafts in a relatively short period of time...Read More

More About Hair Transplants

A hair transplant is quite a simple procedure in principle. Hair is taken from one part of the patient’s head...Read More


Beard Transplants

Beard transplants work in a very similar way to hair transplants and can provide guys who are self-conscious about their facial hair with a much fuller and thicker beard...Read More


Real Patient Results

3500 FU strip – 8 months post-op

View all case studIES

Marijuana & Hair Loss

With the legalization of cannabis in Canada this week there has been a lot of discussion on the medicinal benefits and harmful effects of marijuana. When it comes to the general population of its users, this widely popular plant is used for a variety of reasons (and...

read more

What Are PRP Injections Used For?

We discuss PRP Injections a lot on our blog posts, and thats because its a very popular procedure for hair loss, and many other medical issues, including wound and soft tissue healing. If you deal with pain, arthritis or injuries, you might also use Platelet Rich...

read more

Elon Musk’s Hair Transplant

Tech CEO and visionary Elon Musk has made headlines for many years – for his formidable wealth, his outlandishly a Exchange Holland, most recently, his highly lawsuit with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that forced him to step down from his...

read more

Join the VIP List for special pricing, offers, promotions and more...

You have Successfully Subscribed!